Absent In The Spring

Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Year of Publication: 1944

Motive for Murder: None

Plot:

Tell Abu Hamid, November 1936. Joan Scudamore has missed her train connection to Stanboul. Being stuck in a remote rest house, she is faced with unprecedented circumstances which delays her return to London.

absent2

1944’s the US book jacket ofFarrar and Rinehart NY.

Two days turn four; the wadi flood has rendered the rail tracks impassable. Breathing the healing air of the Syrian desert, she finds herself rejuvenated in the serene surroundings. Her mind begins to recollect the past events; the words of an old school friend she has bumped into at Baghdad are playing reels of reminiscences in her head.  To her astonishment subconscious thoughts surge forward, which lead to her asking herself questions she has never done before.

Did she a devoted wife to Rodney, a dedicated mother to Averil, Tony and Barbara and a good person she had believed?

Highlights:

 

From you I have been absent in the spring

When proud-piep April, dressed in all his trim,

Hath put a spirit of youth in everything

That heavy Saturn laughed and leapt with him

                                                                                                            -Sonnet 98

As Mary Westmacott, Christie cherishes her departure from crime novels. Her fascination about self and the complexity of human mind are the two passions she’s been able to explore under the pseudo name.

For twenty years her other identity is scarcely recognised – even by her ardent fans. For twenty years the six so-called romance books has gained modest successes. Her observation about class and love and changing times in society are woven into the dynamics in self by nurture and through distinctive experience.

Absent In The Spring is the third book published during the War.  She finished it in three days straight, of which it has given her such immense pleasure in its process. The manuscript then went to print as it was – as she wished.

In this long monologue of a country lawyer’s wife Christie puts aside her usual style of storytelling. Joan’s self dialogues during her five days’ wait in the lovely warm November sun hardly scratch the surface with the afore-mentioned Shakespeare’s Sonnet.

When Blanche Haggard recognises her school friend at the girls’ boarding school St. Anne’s, her cry ‘holy Moses, it’s Joan!’ is genuine. Off all places; thousands of miles away from the good old England is a face she hasn’t seen for fifteen years. On the other hand, Joan has noticed the girl she once adored first, but has chosen to study her instead.

In portraying the two contrasting personalities – Blanche the carefree, Joan the obliging- through exchanges and remarks, Christie is outlining the ‘picture’ of her protagonist. On the one hand, Joan’s civil responses is the opposite to Blanche’s careless comments about Rodney ‘having a roving eye’ and Barbara ‘too young to be married’ in which Blanche’s insinuating that the young woman did so to get away from home. On the other hand, in spite of Joan’s feeling offended to the other,  Blanche’s words set in motion the train of thoughts which persist to continue as they part the next day.

In the subsequent chapters Christie invites her readers to ‘splash some colours’ to Joan. Her mind wandering might be rather unexciting for the first half of the story. Nonetheless, as her seemingly rose-tinted life begins to reveal some cracks, the random collections begin to make sense.  Did Rodney miss her? Or was he happy to see her go away? Did Barbara want her mother to come to Baghdad to help her convalesce?

Yet nor the lays of birds, nor the sweet smell

   Of different flow’rs in odor and in hue

  Could make me any summer’s story to tell,

          Or from their proud  lap pluck them where they grew

chrsanthemum-2013-4

Joan Scudamore lays yellow chrysanthemums on Leslie Rodston’s grave. They  means neglected love or sorrow. The Victorian language of flowers are used in the story to convey the truth of a matter.   

Joan’s torrents of flashbacks take an unexpected turn, just as a sonnet alters after the eighth line. In the accidental company of an Indian servant whom serves her meals and drinks, his simple take on life makes her rethink her self image. Their limited exchange of words expresses a gentle phase of change in her through him; her perceived ideas on how to live a life becomes reconstructed. She questions whether leading a busy life actually an antidote to happiness.

Blanche and the Indian man are like pistons that runs the engine; more than minor characters. Then the advice of Miss Gilbey, the headteacher of St. Anne’s, when she left school, runs in her head: ‘think of others, my dear and not too much of yourself.’

The moment Joan admits the flaws in her judgements; the decisions she’s made as to what’s best for her family, another crack – much bigger than the previous ones- emerge: Rodney’s nonchalant attitude over the years and her marriage that has gone amiss. For quite sometime. As she turns her focus in the aftermath of Rodney’s breakdown, she sees her life differently.

 Nor did I wonder at the lily’s white

Nor praise the deep vermillion in the rose,

They were but sweet, but figures of delight,

    Drawn after you, you pattern of all those.

3682715623_a0901b2d06

Rodney Scudamore is spotted by his wife wearing red rhododendrons on his lapel – the spring flowering species- in the churchyard.  An interesting substitute to ‘the deep vermillion in rose’ in the sonnet, for rhododendron means ‘rose’ and ‘tree’ in ancient Greek  

In a twist for which Christie has been famous, her clever use of the sonnet for her euphemism to a late-flowering affection is apparent. Joan has worked out herself and declares defeat.

Thus, this is not a story of a woman having an epiphany in her solitude. This is a story of a spectator to an unconsummated love, born from the shared interest in which Joan has no part.  The last proud-pied April comes before the devastating May that marks the other woman’s passing.

Yet it seemed it winter still, and,

You away,

As with your shadow I with these did play

Alas, Joan is the Saturn; the winter in Near Eastern that is ‘moving’ towards England. Yet she carries the shadow of the love little did she realise flourish for years under her very eye.

P.S. If any displeasure can be highlighted is the fact that the Baghdad Railway was completed in 1940. Thus, there couldn’t be any trains running beyond Mosul in 1936. Also, Tell Abu Hamid is a small-populated town in the district of ash-Sharqiyah in Egypt (in the eastern side of Jordan valley) and not in Syria as suggested.

Notes On Curtain: Poirot’s Last Case

Rating: 5 out of 5

Year of Publication: 1975

Motive for Murder: Revenge

Plot:

Reunion at the Styles – now it’s a guest house run by the Rutrells. After another war, Arthur Hastings and Hercule Poirot come back to the former home of the Cavendishes for a summer. To Hasting’s surprise his youngest daughter Judith is present; the fresh graduate works for Dr John Franklin whom conducts medical experiments  on the poisonous Calabar beans. He stays with his wife Barbara on Sir William Boyd Carrington’s recommendation. The baronet knows Colonel Rutrell and has occupied a room while his nearby country home Knatton is being refurbished.

When Hastings settles down, Poirot reveals his mission: not for old time’s sake – that’s for sure. He tells the other five murder cases: none of them is related to one another. Nonetheless, the murderer is in the Styles – one of the guests.

slide_325262_3114435_free

David Suchet and Hug Fraser on the adaptation of Curtain – the final in 13th series.

Poirot has been watching him; no sooner did he learn that the cunning criminal would also spend the Summer there than he checked himself in and invited his sidekick. For old time’s sake- of course.

‘This, Hastings, will be my last case. It will be,too, my most interesting case – and my most interesting criminal. For in X we have a technique superb, magnificent, that arouses admiration in spite of oneself.’

The stake is high because the killer’s alibi is watertight. There’s no shred of evidence to tie him with a murder, but the mind’s game the killer has played to each person who is then sentenced for their crimes. More importantly, not only does Poirot have to think one step ahead, but he also has to keep an eye on his sidekick. And maybe, to take a life.

Highlights:

In my beginning is my end, in my end is my beginning. The engraved words on T.S. Eliot’s tomb at St. Mary’s Church in East Choker, Somerset sums up about the book: in Styles  Poirot and Hastings’s friendship commences and in Styles their adventure end. They come a full circle.

Styles is  crumbling. As Hastings recalls Summer 1916, Mary Cavendish is a distant memory but the murder of Emily Inglethorp.

Apparently Christie wrote the book during the War. The uncertain time and the death of his son-in-law might have had a significant influence to her that she might have died before concluding about her famous foreign detective. Hence her omission about the War in the book, her subtle but bitter expressions about old age and her inventing a monster in a serial killer that would never stand in the court to face justice.

shirburns

Shirburn Castle in Watlington, Oxfordshire, UK. Built in 1377, it’s now a country house for fictitious Styles Court.

In Curtain, both Poirot and Hastings are vulnerable. The sleuth is now an infirm and a wheelchair-bound man whilst his companion a widower. Judith’s presence amplifies his thoughts of his late wife and increases his sense of protection towards his daughter at the same time.

Christie makes clear that Curtain is distinguished to her first book, although they are related in some ways. Daisy Luttrell – an efficient B&B manager but has a sharp tongue-  might jog readers’ mind to Evelyn Howard’s commanding manner. Sir William Carrington has a number of traits of John Cavendish and the bird enthusiast Stephen Norton in John’s brother Lawrence. John Franklin, serious and being preoccupied with his work, can be an equal to Alfred Inglethorp whilst Franklin’s countenance resembles Dr Bauerstein. As for Judith Hastings, she may be likened to Cynthia Murdock – Mrs. Inglethorp’s ward. Both women are committed and passionate about their professions.

Hence it was inevitable to read Curtain without revisiting the former home of the Cavendishes. The contrast between a thirty-year-old Hastings, a wounded officer on a month’s leave and a grey-haired, much older man is stark. But still the same narrator who guides readers to see a chain of reactions unfolding.

If in the first crime book Hastings is merely an observer hovering round Poirot and Inspector Japp, in Curtain Christie puts him in a tight place. So tight that Poirot must insist on the other’s drinking his unsavoury cocoa drink.

ph16

Also known as Calabar beans, it is native of Nigeria. Its use as an ‘ordeal poison’ among African tribes means to determine a person’s innocence

Furthermore, if Strychnine was catapulted to fame in 1920, in Curtain Physostigma Venenosum is chosen. Christie’s fascinating knowledge to poisons is well known, although it’s the nature of Barbara Franklin’s demise that is far more interesting in the plot. Even for an avid reader it will catch them off guard.

As Poirot has remarked, the killer is a most interesting criminal. Just as Jacko Argyll, the perpetrator doesn’t do it themselves.

For Christie has challenged readers from the onset to detect anything untoward in the words, intonation and timing in some suspects, including Hastings’s. A sentence whispered here or a response there built up over a period of time deliver a corresponding impact to a stab to the lungs. Here is a malicious slayer who understands that neither a slander nor a hearsay make an evidence in court. At the very least such will only be considered to help judge the character of a witness.

The accidental shooting of Mrs. Luttrell by her husband sees the killer’s testing the water. What did the killer do to raise George Luttrell’s anger? Dissatisfied, the slayer continues with Plan B.  It fails, but only to Poirot he can see that next time it will succeed.

‘Come, Hastings, you are not as stupid as you like to pretend. You have studied those cases I gave you to read. You may not know who X is, but you know X’s technique for committing a crime.’

Christie’s habit of throwing off scents with red-herring subplots seems scarce in Curtain.  She invents Elizabeth Cole (see more on The Most Fascinating Character) as a reassurance to Poirot’s deductions. For she’s the only one who has a connection to one of the cases and more importantly has known X.

Halfway, the elimination process might be achieved as to whodunit. None perhaps hardly prepares about the stupefying ending. For Christie puts forward the quest between morality and conscience in the course of justice; a notion about a thing should be done, not the right thing to be.

Last but not least, it’s worth looking at Christie’s contemplations on the issue of euthanasia (see Clues). The discussion which contrasts moral and courage, legality against necessity is one of her greatest’s dialogue I have ever seen. I wish she knew that forty-two years later the matter is still relevant.

Curtain is simply Christie’s finest masterpiece, of which was published in the last summer before she died.

At last, it’s the end of my reviewing all Agatha Christie’s crime novels. It’s long overdue, but a much satisfying process. Had I rushed to share my thoughts right after I had finished my reading, I wouldn’t have been able to appreciate it.

Finally, I would advise readers to postpone perusing Curtain until they are acquainted well with a number of her renowned crime novels.

The Twists:

-Elizabeth Cole lies about her surname

-Judith Hastings is in love with John Franklin

-Arthur Hastings inadvertently kills Barbara Franklin

-Hercule Poirot can actually walk round and is not as ill as he looks

The Most Fascinating Character: Elizabeth Cole

‘My name is Lichfield,’ says Elizabeth Cole to Arthur Hastings. He describes her as ‘ a woman of between thirty and forty, slightly haggard, with a clear-cut profile and really beautiful eyes. There was about her an air of reserve, more –of suspicion.’

Cole is her mother’s surname. She has adopted it in the aftermath of his father’s demise. Matthew Lichfield is the male equal to the larger-than-life character Mrs. Boynton (see Appointment With Death).

helen-baxendale-jez-c-self

Helen Baxendale as E.Cole in the adaptation of Curtain in 2013

A bully, Mr. Litchfield is nevertheless rich.  Like Mrs. Boynton he imprisons his grown-up daughters to serve him.

He dies from a blunt force trauma in his skull, delivered by Elizabeth’s elder sister Margaret. She has finished him with a single blow at the back of his head.  Then she confesses that she did it so that her sisters could be freed from the golden cage.

Elizabeth has been acquainted with the Luttrells; George and Daisy are her longstanding friends. So they welcome her at the Styles and tell not anyone a single word about her true identity. To Hastings Elizabeth remarks about the colonel and his vinegar-tongued wife: ‘he’s rather a dear and she’s nicer than you’d think.’

It’s not clear whether Poirot has been informed about Elizabeth prior to his stay. Yet he reckons that X would stay. Moreover, X also knows the Franklins and the Luttrells.

Elizabeth is seen to spend time with Stephen Norton often. They get closer, as both are single. He’s her family’s friend, too. What she says about Norton: ‘he’s very nice –rather shy- just a little stupid, perhaps. He’s always been rather delicate. He’s lived with his mother – rather a peevish, stupid woman. She bossed him a good deal, I think. She died a few years ago. He’s keen on birds and flowers and things like that. He’s a very kind person – and he’s the sort of person who sees a lot.’ Does she like him?

In spite of her looking reserved, she’s studied people a great deal. Hastings listens to her and her observation about the suspects’ characters are precise.

Cast of Characters:

Guests at the Styles:

-Major Allerton

-Curtiss (Poirot’s manservant)

-Nurse Craven (Mrs. Franklin’s nurse)

skywomenfilmtelevisionawards2011insidexa_k4zx920hl

Philip Glenister as Boyd Carrington in 2013’s adaptation on ITV

-Miss Elizabeth Cole (an old friend of the Luttrells)

-The Franklins ( John and Barbara)

-Judith Hastings

-Stephen Norton

-Sir William Boyd Carrington

Other:

-The Luttrells (Colonel George and his spouse Daisy)

-George (Poirot’s longstanding valet)

Clues:

A.Conversation between Sir William Boyd Carrington (BC) and Barbara Franklin (BF):

BC: ‘You’ve not changed much since you were seventeen, Babs. Do you remember that garden house of yours and the bird bath and the coconuts?’

BC to Arthur Hastings: ‘Barbara and I are old playmates.’

BF: ‘Old playmates!’

BC: ‘Oh, I’m not denying that you’re over fifteen years younger than I am. But I played with you as a tiny tot when I was a young man. Gave you pick-a-backs, my dear. And then later I came home to find you a beautiful young lady – juts on the point of making your debut in the world – and I did my share by taking you out on the golf links and teaching you to play golf. Do you remember?’

BF: ‘Oh, Bill, do you think I’d forget?’

BF to AH: ‘My people used to live in this part of this world. And Bill used to come and stay with his old uncle, Sir Everard, at Knatton.’

BC: ‘And what a mausoleum it was – and is. Sometimes I despair of getting the place liveable. ‘

BF: ‘Oh, Bill, it could be made marvellous – quite marvellous!’

BC: ‘Yes, Babs, but the trouble is I’ve got no ideas. Baths and some really comfortable chairs – that’s all I can think of. It needs a woman.’

BF: ‘I’ve told you I’ll come and help. I mean it. Really.’

B.On the subject of euthanasia among Arthur Hastings (AH), Boyd Carrington, Judith Hastings (JH) and Stephen Norton (SN)

JH: ‘I mean that anyone who’s weak – in pain and ill- hasn’t got the strength to make a decision – they can’t. It must be done for them. It’s the duty of someone who loves them to take the decision.’

AH: ‘Duty?’

JH: ‘Yes, duty. Someone whose mind is clear and who will take the responsibility.’

BC: ‘And end up in the dock charged with murder?’

JH: ‘Not necessarily. Anyway, if you love someone, you would take the risk.’

SN: ‘But look here, Judith, what you’re suggesting is simply a terrific responsibility to take.’

JH: ‘I don’t think it is. People are too afraid of responsibility. They’ll take responsibility where a dog is concerned – why not with a human being?’

SN: ‘Well – it’s rather different, isn’t it?’

JH: ‘Yes, it’s more important.’

SN (murmuring): ‘You take my breath away.’

BC: ‘So you’d take the risk, would you?’

JH: ‘I think so. I’m not afraid of taking risks.’

BC: ‘It wouldn’t do, you know.You can’t have people here, there, everywhere, taking the law into their own hands, deciding matters of life and death.’

SN: ‘Actually, you know Boyd Carrington, most people wouldn’t have the nerve to take the responsibility.’

SN (smiling faintly) to JH: ‘Don’t believe you would if it came to the point.’

JH: ‘One can’t be sure, of course. I think I should.’

SN: ‘Not unless you had an axe of your own to grind.’

JH: ‘That just shows you don’t understand at all. If I had a- a personal motive, I couldn’t do anything. Don’t you see? It’s got to be absolutely impersonal. You could only take the responsibility of – of ending a life if you were quite sure of your motive. It must be absolutely selfless.’

SN: ‘All the same you wouldn’t do it.’

JH: ‘I would. To begin with I don’t hold life as sacred as people do. Unfit lives, useless lives – they should be got out of the way. There’s so much mess about. Only people who can make a decent contribution to the community ought to be allowed to live. The others ought to be put painlessly away.’

JH to BC: ‘You agree with me, don’t you?’

BC: ‘In principle, yes. Only the worthwhile should survive.’

JH: ‘Wouldn’t you take the law into your own hands if it was necessary?’

BC: ‘Perhaps. I don’t know…’

SN: ‘A lot of people would agree with you in theory. But practice is a different matter.’

JH: ‘That’s not logical.’

SN: ‘Of course it’s not. It’s really a question of courage. One just hasn’t got the guts, to put it vulgary. Frankly, you know Judith, you’d be just the same yourself. You wouldn’t have the courage when it came to it.’

JH: ‘Don’t you think so?’

SN: ‘I’m sure of it.’

BC: ‘I think you’re wrong, Norton. I think Judith has any amount of courage. Fortunately the issue doesn’t present itself.’

Notes on The Moving Finger

Rate: 4 out of five

Year of Publication: 1943

Motive for Murder: Greed

 

Plot:

In a sleepy Lymstock, nothing untoward happened. Peace was the norm in the idyllic village: no wars, no bombs.  Until the first murder occurred.  The Symmingtons’ housemaid body was found cold in the downstairs’ cupboard with a blunt force trauma in her head. A week beforehand, Mona Symmington committe suicide.

bddea1370bf8ce6247ad5e0ff77aecda

Chilham village in Kent, the filming location for fictitious Lymstock in 2006’s adaptation of Miss Marple series.

 

Anonymous hate letters had circulated, as the poison pen  spread scare among the villagers. Despite their being defiant about the letters, fears and anxiety increased being a target of abhorrent accusations.

In the meantime, Megan Hunter saw something on the day her mother died. A young girl of twenty, she was often seen wandering round the village either in her bike or on foot. Aimee Griffith disliked her idleness, whereas some had sympathy to the girl whose mother paid little attention to her.

She saw something she wasn’t supposed to see. As she realised what would happen next, it was nobody but her who could prevent it become materialised. Could she trust herself to take a high risk to save her life and others?

 

Highlights:

In today’s social media age, the tales of fake news and rampant finger pointing are ubiquitous; the internet trolls that spewed poisonous comments then propelled an issue to a much larger scale and onto a different level.

The devastating impact of hoaxes had also left imprints in Christie’s world; Elinor Carlisle receiving spiteful letters after her engagement in Sad Cypress(1940) and Dr. Charles Odfield asking for Poirot’s help to clear his name due to rumours about his poisoning his late wife in the Labours of Hercules (1947). If vile letters were exist in those books to flavour to a plot, in The Moving Finger the issue became the epitome of an abuse in words.

From the onset Christie put forward the various effects of libels for their respective recipients. To the brother and sister Jerry and Joanna Burton, such was an expression of alienation to foreigners that strengthens the villagers’ watchful glance towards them and their quiet sighing to their cosmopolitan behaviour. To Dick Symmington the solicitor, his reputation, having only opened his practice for a few years, was at stake.

Supposed the book was a blank painting canvass,  Christie then had morphed it into a Jackson Pollock ; the dialogues were the outpourings of characters’ mind while delivering blatant criticism on society.

I have noticed that the books Christie had written during the War may carry the homogenous spirit of being bold and fearless about life. They expose the worst in human’s nature that leave pins and needles sensations in their wake.

42cec02fd5f80fe4f86df6e1d5329068

London Children during The Blitz 1940

 

As far as I am concerned, Christie stayed put in London during the War. Her decision was made mainly because of her daughter, Rosalind Hick, whose first husband Hubert de Burgh Pritchard was on an active service an died in 1944.

Come what may, the book touched nothing about the War, although the apparent distress which engulfed Lymstock might have mirrored the uncertainty of the War. Clearly Christie banned any mention of it, but turned the sky of ostensibly picture-perfect setting of the countryside into a cloud of vultures circling an area where a carcass of crime is identifiable and the smell of it inevitable.

Enter the young village doctor Owen Griffith and the orphan Megan Hunter. Together with the Burtons Christie spun the plot around the four of them. Jerry seemed to be an extrovert version of Colonel Hastings; Joanna’s carefree attitude paralleled to Giselda Clement (Murder At The Vicarage) and Dr. Griffith might have been Dr. James Sheppard – only younger and more handsome.

As circumstances altered and characters changed, attention turned into Aimee Griffith, Owen’s older sister.  A semblance to Catherine Sheppard, Aimee was atypical spinster character in other books (see more on The Most Fascinating Character). Likewise, Mona Symmington could be likened to Mrs Ferrars (see Notes On The Murder of Roger Ackroyd).  By the same token, Mr. Ackroyd’s housekeeper Miss Russel had the same traits to Mrs Cane de Althorp  – their detecting ‘bad smell’ in people.

The plot saw Christie’s  marvelling at putting the right dose between feeding excitement and inducing sinister sentiments. Clues dropped in unexpected situations obscured in an ambiguous tone. Whilst it could be quite confusing at times, her sticking to Jerry’s viewpoint held together the loose ends.

As expected, the subplots bore comparable details in her previous books. Nonetheless,  it takes a skilful writer with tricks up her sleeves to pinch a detail and combine it with others to create an entirely different setting. Halfway  I felt I could guess whodunit although I realised that the theatrical touch in it would only make sense as I turned to the last chapter.

Miss Marple remained behind the screen until the last five thousand words.  Meanwhile, some readers might have asked themselves whether the Burtons had been a one-off Tommy and Tuppence. Only in the end it explained the police’s involving Jerry in the investigation in spite of the fact he was a suspect.

To conclude, it is a Miss Marple book that deserves more recognition among Christie’s fans. It’s more than the craft of the plot, but a study of point of views: have we seen an issue in a bigger picture?

 

The Twists:

-Dick Symmington donated his old typewriter to the Women’s Institute

-Megan Hunter’s father was imprisoned for blackmail

-Aimee Griffith wrote the anonymous letter to Elsie Holland

– Joanna Burton received a hate letter that was intended for Emily Barton

– Mrs Dane Calthrop roped in help from an old friend: Miss Marple

– Emily Barton’s prayer book with ripped pages used by the Poison Pen in different anonymous letters was found in the Symmingtons’ downstairs cupboards

 

Cast of Characters:

– Mrs. Baker (Beatrice’s mum; Beatrice a housemaid at Little Furze)

– The Burtons (Joanna and Jerry)

– The Dane Calthrops (Reverend Caleb and his wife)

– Elsie Holland (a governess at the Symmingtons)

– Emily Barton (whose house Little Furze was rented out to the Burtons)

– Florence (Miss Barton’s former maid)

– Miss Ginch (Dick Symmington’s secretary in the law office)

– Inspector Graves (Scotland Yard)

– The Griffiths (Owen the village doctor and Aimee who ran girl’s guide)

– Marcus Kent (Jerry Burton’s doctor)

– Megan Hunter (Mona Symmington’s daughter from her first marriage)

– Superintendent Nash

– Partridge (the cook at Little Furze)

– Sergeant Perkins

– Mr Pye (the proud owner of Prior’s Lodge who has a penchant for antiques)

– The Symmingtons (Dick the lawyer and his wife Mona)

 

The Most Fascinating Character: Aimee Griffith

Christie’s crime novels have a number of spinsters in them; from Miss Marple herself to Kirsten Lindstrom (Ordeal by Innocence); from Cecilia Williams (Five Little Pigs) to Nurse Jessie Hopkins (Sad Cypress).

Aimee Griffith is not just another one. In her most renowned book, Christie establishes Dr. Shepepard’s sister’s reputation being a chief gossip in King’s Abbot right from the beginning. On the contrary,  she introduces Aimee as just one of Jerry Burton’s encounters with the villagers without a hint of importance to her role. Her presence is more often due to her access to a typewriter the police have believed being used to type the poisonous letters.

jessicahynes

Jessica Hynes as Aimee Griffith in 2006’s Miss Marple series

 

She disapproves  Megan Hunter; her being the daughter of ‘the wrong un’ To Jerry Burton, Aimee is rather overwhelming. ‘Too much an Amazon for me,’ heremarks to Joanna once.

Unlike other fore-mentioned spinster characters, Aimee is good looking. She is comfortable in her own skin and bold, although she seems to be on guard with words and tends to keep her ideas to herself.

In her absence still there are echoes of her. She argues with Jerry about gender equality with  apparent franknesss. ‘It is incredible to you that women should want a career. It was incredible to my parents. I was anxious to study for a doctor. They would not hear of paying the fees. But they paid them readily for Owen. Yet I should have made a better doctor than my brother.’

The bombshell is then dropped when the police arrest Aimee for sending a warning letter to Elsie Holland. Worse, Aimee has denied having done it. Meanwhile, the police has realised she has held back information about two other suspects.

Things look pessimistic for her. Only Miss Marple who can help squash her charge with a huge favour from Megan.

 

Clues:

Jerry Burton (JB) and Aimee Griffith (AG) (after the inquest on the death of Mona Symmington):

AG; ‘ I was terribly sorry for Dick Symmington its all having to come put as it did at the inquest. It was awful for him.’

JB: ‘But surely you heard him say that there was not a word of truth in that letter – that he was quite sure of that?’

AG: ‘Of course he said so. Quite right. A man’s got to stick up for his wife. Dick would. You see, I’ve known Dick Symmington a long time.’

JB: ‘Really? I understood from your brother that he only bought this practice a few years ago.’

AG: ‘Oh yes, but Dick Symmington used to come and stay in our part of the world up north. I’ve known him for years. I know Dick very well…. He’s a proud man, and very reserved. But he’s the sort of man who could be very jealous.’

JB: ‘That would explain why Mrs. Symmington was afraid to show him or tell him about the letter. She was afraid that, being a jealous man, he might not believe her denials.’

AG: ‘Good Lord. DO you think any woman would go and swallow a lot of cyaniade potassium for an accusation that wasn’t true?’

JB: ‘The coroner seemed to think it was possible. Your brother, too…’

AG: ‘Men are all alike. All for preserving the decencies. But you don’t catch me believing that stuff. If an innocent woman get some foul anonymous letter, she laughs and chucks it away. That’s what I….would do.’

JB: ‘I see. So you’ve had one, too.’

 

Dick Symmington(DS) and Megan Hunter(MH):

MH: ‘I would like to speak to you, please. Alone.’

DS: ‘Well, Megan, what is it? What do you want?’

MH: ‘I want some money.’

DS: ‘Couldn’t you have waited until to-morrow morning? What’s the matter, do you think your allowance is inadequate?’

MH: ‘I want a good deal of money.’

DS: ‘You will come of age in a few months’ time. Then the money left you by your grandmother will be turned over to you by the public trustee.’

MH: ‘ You don’t understand. I want money from you. Nobody’s ever talked to me much about my father. They’ve not wanted me to know about him. But I do know he went to prison and I know why. It was for blackmail!

‘Well, I am his daughter. And perhaps I take after him. Anyway, I am asking you to give me money because… if you don’t….’

Christie, England’s First Female Serial Killer and a Wren

The book, published in 1973, brings attention about her a century later.

In 1873 Mary Ann Cotton is sent to the gallows in Durham Jail. She’s been charged with the murder of a seven-year-old boy, her step son. Nevertheless, the forty-one-year-old nursemaid maintains her innocence until her last breath. Arthur Appleton’s book brings attention about her a century later.

She’s hanged as traces of Arsenic has been found in her victim. What’s more, evidence mounts of her having done the same to at least 15 others. In fact, the number could be 21 in total.

Suddenly West Auckland is shaken by a serial killer in its midst: a seemingly harmless miner’s daughter who allegedly has ended life her four husbands, her lovers, her mother, her step children, and her own ones. Although she’s more murderous than Jack the Ripper, little is known about her outside North East of England.

Fast forward to 19th February 1941. In Tenby Kathleen Skin can see the blazes from Swansea after the bombardments. Over three days the Luftwaffe has dropped 800 explosives and 35,000 incendiaries have fallen on the city bringing about raging fires, destroying its ancient centres, killing and injuring hundreds of people.

Kathleen Skin in her Wren uniform

Infuriated, she realises her days as a nanny is over. She takes a day off work to undertake health tests in order to join the Women’s Royal Navy Service (WRNS). She passes them, but not until in the very last one she finds out she’s failed due to her weight. A few pounds more are all she needed on the scale to meet the minimum six stones requirement. That day she comes back dejected, preparing food for the baby’s dinner in a sombre mood.

These women, a Britain’s first female serial killer and eventually a ‘Wren’ heroine, live in different periods, but they mirror some female characters in Christie’s books. Did she ever hear about Mary Ann, I wonder? Did she ever meet one in the Women’s Forces, her source of inspiration for Lynn Marchmont (see Notes on Taken by The Flood)?

A women serial killer is highlighted in By The Pricking of My Thumbs (1968), which features the duo Tommy and Tuppence Beresford. A painting Tuppence has inherited from her late aunt Ada then arises Tuppence’s curiosity. For later she notices something amiss on it and so her adventure begins.

Furthermore, the authoress’s fascination about a cold-blooded murderess’s state of mind gives way to the rise of them, notably in Lord Edgware Dies (1933), Peril At End House (1932) and After The Funeral (1953). Although the murderess Tuppence helps unearth doesn’t pay her dues, her crimes ring the same bell as Mary Ann’s.

Skin’s true account of life during the last War is re-told in The Girls Who Went to War. Before she can realise her dream to be a Wren, she has a stint in the Land Army. Unlike Marchmont, Skin isn’t posted abroad. The dream to see the world subsides after the VE Day, as Skin is back to ‘Civvy Street’ and retrains as a teacher. Likewise, Marchmont is demobbed and home in Spring 1946 after two and a half years ago spent overseas.

Mary Ann fits in Christie’s adage ‘anyone can be a murderer.’ Nobody at that time could believe such crimes had been carried out in return of insurance money. Moreover is Mary Ann’s manipulation to men, a trait that would remind avid readers to a famous King’s Counsel Mr. Mayherne being played at in The Witness of Prosecution.

Life after the Service will never be the same for both Skin and Marchmont, albeit there is a delayed wedding to consider. For Marchmont, the untimely death of a super rich uncle Gordon Cloade affect her and her cousin/fiancée Rowley; their being drifted apart as Marchmont is drawn to the attractive David Hunter, with whom she feels the connection while sharing their wartime experiences. As for Skin, the strange behaviour of her fiancée Arnold concerns her a lot.

Arsenic poisoning is not much mentioned in Christie’s books, for she prefers the uses of poisonous plants, such as Foxgloves and Strychnines and drugs, ie. trinitrines, prussic acid and Bromides. Nevertheless, Mary Ann goes Scot free many times with a common method of administering Arsenic in tea. The deaths of those children in her care are referred as ‘gastric fever,’ which bear similar symptoms. A doctor who releases the death certificates to some children is already suspicious and the allegations are proven following the exhumation of the bodies.

Christie captures well Marchmont’s mixed feelings about adjusting to civilian life, but she might be over the top having written in the book: ‘….wonderful to be out of uniform, to be able to get into a tweed skirt and a jumper – even if the moths had been rather too industrious during the war years!’

For the WRNS navy blue uniform is considered at the top of the fashion. Designed by Edward Molyneux, its straight streamlined jacket is envied compared to the belted waists and pleated pockets of the ATS’s and WAAF’s. Not to mention the Wrens are allowed to wear a pair of black stockings, a privilege indeed to show their feminine side. And therefore Marchmont should have been very proud wearing her uniform and the much-admired tricorne hat.

Christie might have heard the WRNS recruitment is the hardest of the three Women’s Forces and regarded as the classiest. Perhaps for those reasons she has chosen Marchmont to be a Wren. Thumbs up to Christie who has brought up the least-mentioned symbol until recent of the Women’s Forces whose contributions to the War effort are significant. In this post-war novel she also reflects about her loss, having received a War Office Telegram for her daughter’s first husband.

Fiction and real life can be inexplicably interwoven, but at the same time they can be very contrasting. Skin might not be as lucky in love as Marchmont, but she sees the world after all by taking a job as a teacher in Malaysia. In the next few decades she lives in Asia and Africa.

Meanwhile, Mary Ann Cotton brings the secrets of the true extent of her crimes into her grave while in Christie’s world Felicie Bault (The Fourth Man, see Notes on The Hound of Death) is the nearest character I can think of. I begin to doubt whether Mrs. Lancaster is as ‘daring’ as Mary Ann nonetheless.

She’s dead and she’s rotten
Lying in bed with her eyes wide open
Sing? Sing? What song should I sing?
Mary Ann Cotton is tied up in string
Where? Where? She’s up in the air
And now their selling puddings for a penny pair

Readers, would you turn Mary Ann’s life into a novel?

————–

‘The Hand That Smoothed The Pillow’ about the Victorian killer’s life was presented by her descendant Theresa Musgrove. Duncan Barrett (co-author with Nuala Calvi) discussed about their newly-launched book The Girls Who Went to War. The two events were part of Finchley Literary Festival from 20th to 24th May 2015.

A Postcard From London

A postcard from London

For You

To say ‘Hello’ and ‘Thank You’

And share the joy

Of receiving something

Other than bills

I hope the thrill of it

Will bring a smile

And fill your heart with peace

For the better year

London Postcard

This is one of the postcards sent to family and friends this year. What Christie’s Fan’s followers will receive are a different design nevertheless. It’s a surprise! 

Should you be interested in receiving a postcard, please kindly send me an email on knowingchristie@yahoo.com. Alternatively a text message to +447775923550 (on whatsapp and viber).

Address supplied will be treated as confidential and in return I will expect the same.

I will understand if some of you might feel ‘strange’ on the above request, but the intention is genuine.

…….Initially :)

‘Christie In A Year’ officially ends yesterday. Seventy-five books reviewed, eleven titles remain (eight books and three plays). Six of Mary Westmacott’s, too.

Last night I heard Mrs. Boyle (The Mousetrap) shout in my head. ‘You’ve got to find who murdered me!’ She was a grumpy old woman, complaining at every opportunity to Molly Ralston about the guest house.

The authoress's bronze statue was unveiled on 18th November 2012. At the heart of West End, it is situated between Cranborn Street and Great Newport Street, a stone throw away from Leicester Square tube station.

The authoress’s bronze statue was unveiled on 18th November 2012. At the heart of West End, it is situated between Cranborn Street and Great Newport Street, a stone throw away from Leicester Square tube station.

Then Jane Marple appeared while Sherlock Holmes was dying on the box (the third episode of Sherlock Third Series ‘His Last Vow.’). ‘…All my eye and Betty Martin,’ she said to Edward Rossiter and Charmian Stroud (Strange Jest in Miss Marple’s Final Cases). The elderly’s blue eyes twinkled in response to the others’ frowning in awe.

I shook my head as I was brushing my teeth, for the image of Captain Hastings had conjured up in the mirror in front of me. He had just been awake in a chair in which he had slept at. He had meant to wait for Major Allerton, but fell asleep instead. ‘Who was it who wrote, “The darkest day, lived till tomorrow, will have passed away?” And how true it is….’Reflecting, he said those words to himself and felt relieved that he did not kill the major. Hastings did not look at me, for he then got up and washed. It was as if he was telling me: ‘Mind, I do not know yet the killer in this house.’ Curtain, Poirot’s Last Case is the culminating point of the Belgian’s career.

This morning I woke up feeling just like Hasting’s: cramped and uncomfortable. For Parker Pyne has not been mentioned and Verdict and Go Back For Murder are the two plays known little. Not to mention Christie’s other identity as as Mary Westmacott.

And what news of the day than her face cream that helped restore the lustre of 3,000 year old ivory carvings?

Readers, I must continue. Please bear with me.

Notes On The Hound of Death

Rating: 2.5 – three out of five

Year of Publication: 1933

Motive for Murder/Crime: Wealth and the Manipulation of Minds

Highlights: The twelve stories in the book see Agatha Christie in a different light as she takes readers to a journey in spiritualism and indescribable circumstances. Not many bodies around nor the presence of police but ordinary people having to face different dilemmas.

Some of the stories can be categorised into the ghost theme and a touch of mystery seem to underline in each story. Interestingly, this book appears to be a so-called ‘sequel’ The Mysterious Mr. Quin, published three years beforehand (see the Notes). Moreover, it is quite a contrast in terms of plotting compared to The Thirteen Problems (1932 – see the Notes) in which an unassuming spinster is then risen to the fame in Britain.

A black and white sketch of a Baset Hound dog by Mike Sibley on sale on ebay.com.

As a result, the Hound of Death is a fascinating reading – if not probably difficult or baffling to many. I wonder whether some had moments of frowning and skimming the pages trying to spot a clue – like what I did. I put it aside for a few months and came back later after  I had  finished While The Light Lasts (see the Notes). As I pondered over, I began to piece the puzzling bits in each story in the Hound of Death.

It is essential to realise that the authoress is a fan of Sigmund Freud’s theories. Hence, her belief in the power of subconscious self and its great influence towards people’s behaviour. Furthermore, she firmly believes that ‘women’s instinct’ does work in some situations while a ‘vibe’ drive people in their response to a circumstance.

In The Red Signal, the origins of premonition is debated. On the one hand, the expert highlights the scientific side of it; that the warning for a danger comes from within, not defined by an event or behaviour of others – the external factors. On the other, a certain response may emanate from a mixture of gestures and a few words spoken. What makes the difference is the interpretation; to the eye of a psychopath’s someone’s remarks  means a real danger, whereas to the victim ‘a warning’ to his life might have simply been perceived as a mere personal fear or anxiety.

How can someone detect a danger? The Lamp  is an exemplary example on the matter. Here is a widow who decides to take an old house on offer because of its cheap rent. She does not believe about the wandering spirit of a small boy who has died from starvation in the house. Is she to give in to a superstition or go ahead?

The Gypsyto a young man.  He chooses to dismiss them, having shivered at the sight of a gypsy woman. Would he have been alive had he listened to the woman? The idea seems to mirror Minority Report ;  a tale of futuristic police squad who respond to a crime before it occurs.

In S.O.S, an outsider comes across the three letters written on the table in the room where he stays. Will he ignore it as it is none of his business? I recall a letter Poirot receives in Christmas Adventure (see Notes On The Adventure of Christmas Pudding) from an illiterate hand. Yet, the little man with a magnificent beard sees no reason to believe the ‘warning’ and eats a slice of his Christmas pudding. Is he right?

In at least three stories, notably The Hound of Death, Christie elaborates the topic of supernatural power. A nun’s strange visualisation is related to the destruction of a monastery in Belgium when it was surrounded by the Germans in the War.

Quite so. More it concerns with the medium herself.

Then The Last Séance sees things from a medium’s viewpoint. She is very reluctant to perform for the last time. It seems to be she has foreseen the tragic ending that would happen in the end. She gives in because of her greedy husband.

The ending is most fascinating, for the medium’s maid cries in wonder ‘Why Madame is half the size’?

I have never been to a séance and do not believe in the matter of a ‘wandering spirit,’ so can any of you enlighten me on the matter?

My fascination continues in the bewildering case of multiple personalities of a French girl. It is discussed on board the train in The Fourth Man by three men; a nerve specialist, a clergyman and a lawyer. They forget their company nevertheless– another man in the carriage. Having listened to the details of the case with his eyes closed, he eventually speaks up. He knows the girl and the other girl, which holds the clue to the case and nobody have never heard before.

Fortunately, there are some clever crime plots in place in The Red Signal, Wireless and The Witness For Prosecution.  The criminals are a master of disguise. In the latter story readers may have sympathies to a counsel who is in a hot seat. Is the client a murderer or innocent? A manipulative personality or sincere? Decent or cunning? Such character recurs in Christie’s novels and my favourite for an ambiguous character is Michael Rogers in Endless Night (see the Notes).

The Mystery of The Blue Jar concerns an ingenious theft that manipulates naivety. Jack Harthington thinks that he is on the verge of insanity as he seems to have been the only one who heard a cry of ‘Murder. Help! Murder!’ consecutively. His gullible personality leads him to a gang of thieves who is after his uncle’s valuable collection of China jars.

My memory goes to the similar plot deployed in Mr. Eastwood’s Adventure (one of the stories in The Lysterdale Mystery). There are two fake constables that begins with a distress phone call of a woman’s to Mr. Eastwood. Poirot also is in the same situation in Yellow Iris (see Notes On Problem At Pollensa Bay).

I was grinning to have been reminded of the details and the seemingly stupidity of the opposite sex. But, are we women destined to be unlucky in love? Or to brew a wicked scheme in The Strange Case of Sir Arthur Michael Carmichael?

What baffles me is The Call of The Wings. A lonely millionaire feels that it is time to give back to the society. His meeting with a beggar and a tramp spur him on. Consequently, he releases his fortune which ‘binds’ him and thus gains freedom –free from worldly possession.  Supposedly, it is simply a plot created by the man to whom to ‘the poor’ his money would be? Moreover, would someone be free by giving up the world?

In The Strange Case of Sir Arthur Michael Carmichael, I hardly discern the notion of transferring a human soul to a dead cat and the suggestion that the suspect is an animagus. In all honesty, it was like reading Harry Potter books! All is well when the curse is backfired in the end.

The professor, just as Lady Carmichael in Agatha Christie’s world, can change herself into a cat.

Lastly, I cannot decide whether to ‘like’ the book. Perhaps, just to understand the message and why the stories have been written. Over to you now, readers and I would appreciate your comments.

 

 

 

 

Plots, Cast of Characters and The Twist in the order of appearance:

1.       The Hound of Death

Plot: Sister Mary Angelique has strange visualisations, during which she sees herself as a guardian to the faith. Rumour has it that she was calling down the lightning when the German soldiers surrounded a monastery in Belgium. It was then blasted to pieces and all of the soldiers died. Two walls remains standing; one of them has a black mark on it in the shape of a great hound – hence the legend ‘The Hound of Death’.

Since then the nun was brought to Britain as a refugee and has resided in a nursing home in Cornwall. Furthermore, she has become a curious case to the psychiatrist Dr. Rose, who takes interest to her mixing up past and present memories.

Cast:

Mr. Anstruther (a visitor)

Kitty Anstruther (Mr. Anstruther’s sister, with whom the nun used to live when she came to Britain)

Sister Mary Angelique (the patient)

Dr. Rose (the psychiatrist in charge of the nun’s case)

The Twist: Dr. Rose and Sister Mary Angelique die from a landslide

2.       The Red Signal

Plot: A renowned psychiatrist intends to reveal a psychopath among the attendees in a small dinner party. Premonitions and instincts discussed, the psychopath notices what the other knows about his state of his mind and acts accordingly. Can the victim escape from the death trap signed by himself?

Cast:

Sir Arlington West (the psychiatrist)

Dermot West (Sir Arlington’s nephew and Jake Trent’s good friend)

Johnson (Sir Arlington’s manservant)

The Trents (Jake and Clare)

Violet Eversleigh

 

The Twist: Johnson sees Dermot West in a row with his uncle over Clare Trent

 

3.       The Fourth Man

Plot: Three men discuss a psychiatric case on board the train. They debate certain aspects of multiple personalities of Felicia Bault’s which relate to the legal, religious and scientific viewpoints. For instance, is it possible that a simple peasant Brittany girl could have possibly spoken different languages and sang beautifully? Did she strangle herself in the end?

While each of them justify their arguments, a male voice says,’You must excuse me. But I knew her.’ He is the fourth man, who has been sitting quietly in the same carriage. ‘Yes. And Annette Ravel also. You have not heard of Annette Ravel, I see? And yet the story of the one is the story of the other….’

What does the mysterious man mean? Who is he?

Cast:

Dr. Campbell Clark (a physician and mental specialist)

Sir George Durand (a famous lawyer)

Canon Parfitt (a clergyman whose interest is delivering a scientific sermon)

Raoul Letardeau (the Fourth Man)

The Twist: Felicia Bault is under the control of Annette Ravel and therefore Bault would obey whatever the other asks.

 

4.       The Gypsy

Plot: Carpenter’s dislike to Gypsies intrigues his friend, Macfarlane. It began as a child’s dream of seeing a Gypsy woman stand watching him with sad eyes. Years later, Carpenter meets Alistair Haworth at the Lawes. She makes him feel unease nevertheless. ‘I should not go in, if I were you…’ she says, giving him the very similar expression just as the Gypsy’s in the dream. He then is engaged to Esther Lawes and a few weeks later it ends. Yet, before Esther broke their engagement, Haworth remarks: ‘I shouldn’t go back too soon if I were you…’ The last ‘warning’ comes after he sees a doctor who advised an operation to his leg. He runs into a nurse who says: ‘I wouldn’t have that operation, if I were you…’

‘A Gypsy With a Basque Tamborine’ by Jean-Baptise-Camillot-Corot (1796-1875).

‘Dickie’ Carpenter does not awake any more after being put to sleep under the anaesthetic.

Cast:

Alistair Haworth (the medium)

Dickie Carpenter

Mr. Macfarlane

Rachel Lawes (Macfarlane’s fiancée)

Mrs. Rowse (Macfarlane’s housekeeper)

The Twist: Alistair Haworth dies a day after meeting Macfarlane

 

5.       The Lamp

Plot: No.19 at Weyminster has been left neglected for many years – nobody wanted to buy nor rent it. When Mrs. Lancaster moves in with her elderly father and her son, she has been aware of the fact that the house might is haunted. Mr. Winburn, his grandson Geoffrey and the maids hear a little boy crying quietly. A month later, Geoffrey is ill and only then does she hear the eerie sound of another boy than hers.

What does the ‘boy spirit’ want from them?

Cast:

The Lancasters (a widow and Geoffrey, her son)

Mr. Raddish (the house agent)

Mr. Winburn (Mrs. Lancaster’s father)

The Twist:  ‘All right, I’m comin’,’ Geoffrey whispers. He looked past his mother towards the open door. Afterwards, his eyes are closed.

 

6.       Wireless

Plot: A wireless has been bought for the enjoyment of Mary Harther. She nonetheless does not like it, believing modernity around the house is something she cannot fathom.

A reproduction of 1930’s wireless.

Three months after the installation, she hears a voice beyond the grave; her late husband’s. Then again and again, saying the same thing: ‘Patrick speaking to you, Mary. I will be coming for you very soon…’

Be that as it may, she agrees to ‘come’ on Friday night at 9.30 pm. Sitting in her armchair, she waits; the clock is ticking and soon the hand will struck at half past. In the dim light of the doorway stands a familiar figure with chestnut beard and whiskers and old-fashioned Victorian coat. She rises and her body flops onto the floor.

Cast:

Charles Ridgeway (Mary’s nephew)

Elizabeth Marshall (Mary’s servant)

Mr. Hopkinson (Mary’s lawyer)

Mary Harter (Charles’s aunt)

Dr. Meynell (Mary’s doctor)

The Twist: The will made in favour of Charles Ridgeway is written using a special ink that will disappear few days afterwards.

 

7.       The Witness For The Prosecution

Plot: A solicitor for a would-be hung man conducts a long interview with the defendant to establish the nature of the crime. For the man has been charged with the murder of a well-to-do spinster. By chance he met the elderly woman, of whom he has then perceived having had a fancy about him and trusted him to look into her business affairs. Furthermore, she has left a will in which he has become the principal beneficiary.

The woman’s maid, however, depicts the defendant as a gold digger who preys the elderly lonely women. Also, she suggests he hit her mistress with a crowbar. On the night of the murder, she heard their arguments around half past nine. On the contrary, he insists having left the spinster’s house early. Moreover, he says that ‘his wife’ can vouch for him that he was home by half past nine.

Then a letter arrives, written by an illiterate hand, in which the sender asks two-hundred quit for information that will prove the solicitor’s client’s innocence.

 

Cast:

Jane Mackenzie (the murdered woman’s maid)

Leonard Voyle (the suspect)

Mr. Mayherne (the solicitor)

Romaine Heilger (an Austrian, Leonard’s ‘wife’)

The Twist: Romaine Heilger is Voyle’s mistress and she goes out on the night of the murder and does not come back until half past ten.

 

8.       The Mystery of Blue Jar

Plot: A young man of twenty-four years old is up at the link to polish his skill. One morning he hears a cry ‘Help! Murder!’ Dashing to find the source of the voice, he meets a French girl who lives in a Heather cottage near the spot. Yet, she did not hear anything.

The cry recurs at the same time. On the brink of frustration, he describes the occurrence to a man who calls himself ‘a doctor of the soul.’ Furthermore, the young man takes the other to the link and is surprised that he, just as the girl, appears to have not heard any cries of a woman’s.

The doctor suggests that the cry might have come from Mrs. Turner, who used to live in the cottage. According to him, the locals only see Mr. Turner but not his wife. Moreover, the girl says that the house appears to be haunted, for she has been having the same dream of  a foreign woman standing by a table with a blue jar on it. Then she finds a sketch of her in the house. ‘Monsieur le docteur, that is the face of the woman I saw in my dream, and that is the identical blue jar.’

Before the young man realises what he has done, a hundred-years-old Chinese blue jar of his uncle’s has gone.

Cast:

Felise Marchaud (the French girl)

George Harthington (Jake’s uncle who is a Chinese collector)

Jake Harthington (the young man)

Lavington (calls himself ‘a doctor of the soul’)

The Twist: ‘To begin with, although I have taken my degree, I do not practise medicine. Strictly speaking, I am not a doctor – not a doctor of the body, that is.’ Jack looks at Lavington keenly. ‘Or the mind?’ ‘Yes, in a sense, but more truly I call myself a doctor of the soul.’

 

9.       The Strange Case of Sir Arthur Carmichael

Plot: An eminent psychologist is sent for to Wolden, Hertfordshire. The son of late Sir William Carmichael of Wolden has shown signs of depression; he was found wandering the village absentmindedly and has not been his usual self. The only drink he touches is milk.

The psychologist stays over to examine the patient, accompanied by a colleague. It surprises him the intense affection expressed to his stepmother; purring by her side like a tame cat. Meanwhile, little does the patient pay attention to his fiancée.

An image of a Blue Persian cat. In the story, it does say that the colour is grey. Blue or grey?

Intriguingly, when the psychologist enquires the stepmother about her having a cat pet, she denies it. On the contrary, the footman is quite sure that Lady Carmichael had a grey Persian cat that she put it away herself. It has been buried under the copper beech a week ago.

As the psychologist and the colleague dig the cat’s grave, they notice that it has been poisoned with Prussic Acid.

Cast:

Sir Arthur Carmichael (the patient)

Dr. Edward Carstairs (the psychologist)

Lady Carmichael (Sir Arthur’s stepmother)

Dr. Settle (Dr. Edward’s colleague who accompanies him to Wolden)

Phylis Patterson (Sir Arthur’s fiancée)

The footman

The housemaid

The Twist: Sir Arthur Michael falls into a pond and is likely to drawn.

 

10.   The Call of Wings

Plot: An encounter with a tramp on a wintry night leaves a deep impression to a man of means – a millionaire. Not long, he sees a legless man playing the flute; the tunes are different, they are uplifting and inspiring as if there is a pair of wings attached to it. Nonetheless, the thought of it makes him feel unable to breathe in his home, having felt trapped by the worldly possession.

He tells the experience to a nerve specialist and the specialist suggests him see the disabled man again. When they meet, the man draws the face of Pan.

Pan, the god of flocks and shepherds in Greek mythology, is said to create noises in the woods at night – probably the kind of music SIlas Hamer hears emanating from a legless man.

The next thing the millionaire does is to see his friend, who manages an East End mission for the poor. He gives the mission every penny he has.

Cast:

Bernard Seldon (the nerve specialist)

Richard Borrow (Silas’s friend, to whom he gives all his money for the poor)

Silas Hamer (the millionaire)

The Twist:  Silas Hamer becomes a tramp

 

11.   The Last Seance

Plot: A medium see a premonition that the impending séance can be dangerous to her life. She does not like the client for no apparent reason, for they are the ill feelings about the other woman – a grieving mother. Moreover, she knows little about the mother’s background. ‘I won’t do it, Raoul. I won’t do it,’ she pleads. Her husband differs from hers. He said it had not been about the sum of money, but the happiness of the woman to have had one last sight of her child. ‘Oh you torture me,’ murmurs his wife.

What is the medium afraid of? What does the client want from the other?

Cast:

Elise (the maid)

Madame Exe (Simone’s client)

Raoul Daubreil (Simone’s husband)

Simone Daubreil (Raoul’s wife – the medium)

The Twist: Madame Exe binds Raoul’s hands to the back with a string of cord she has brought

 

12.   S.O.S.

Plot: In a rain a man stands staring at the punctured wheels of his car; his being in the middle of nowhere against the inky sky in Wiltshire. His eye catches a gleam of light on the hillside above him. He walks towards it, which turns to be a small cottage inhabited by a family of four. They offer to put him up for the night.

Before he turns in, he notices three letters written on the table in his bedroom. SOS.

Cast:

The Dinsmeads (father, mother and two daughters, Charlotte and Magdalen)

Mortimer Cleveland (the stranger)

The Twist:  Charlotte is not the Dinsmeads’s biological daughter and she might be the lost daughter of a rich Jew man.